mongodb的通配符查询的一次失败经验

2021-07-10 01:33:17

我想find到mongo中的synonym_titles下面的嵌套子json下的影片名字段或者real_titles下面的嵌套子json下的影片名字段：

但是1,2这个info信息字段不确定

所以我想这么查询：

db.search_correct_synonym.find({"synonym_titles.*":"联邦调查局"})

但是失败了，这种查询是告诉mongo，我想找到无论哪一个field，只要包含value=联邦调查局的field

最后的办法，想要找到指定的片名，可以把这些片名copy出来放到一个独立的field里，比如all_titles:["联邦调查局", "帅哥在一九二五"]，可以对该字段建索引。

这样就能根据db.search_correct_synonym.find({"all_titles":"联邦调查局"})找到了

详见http://*.com/questions/6179871/mongodb-wildcard-in-the-key-of-a-query

As asked, this is not possible. The server issue you linked to is still under"issues we‘re not sure of".

MongoDB has some intelligence surrounding the use of arrays, and I think that‘s part of the complexity surrounding such a feature.

Take the following querydb.foo.find({ ‘a.b‘ : 4 } ). This query will match the following documents.

{ a: { b: 4 } }{ a: [ { b: 4 } ] }

So what does "wildcard" do here?db.foo.find( { a.* : 4 } )Does it match the first document? What about the second?

Moreover, what does this mean semantically? As you‘ve described, the query is effectively"find documents where any field in that document has a value of 4". That‘s a little unusual.

Is there a specific semantic that you‘re trying to achieve? Maybe a change in the document structure will get you the query you want.

	thanks, that clarifies. More specifically, what I‘m looking to do is wildcard just the specific node in the branch, i.e. any proper subfield of a. I‘m not clear on how a.* says ‘find where any field‘. Isn‘t it ‘find documents that have a top-level field ‘a‘ with a subfield that matches 4‘? – BradJun 1 ‘11 at 5:48
	I think the confusion here is around "subfield". When I write`{a:{b:4,c:2}}`, I am saying that the value`a`is a JSON object. That JSON object has two keys`b`and`c`. The value of those keys are 4 & 2 respectively. When you are asking for`a.*`, you‘re effectively asking for syntax that loops through all of the keys in that JSON object. Your‘re not asking to"loop through an array", you‘re asking to"loop through an object‘s properties". That‘s a little unusual, which is why I‘m asking for a specific use case here. – Gates VPJun 1 ‘11 at 17:15
	@gates: I have a use case. myDocInMongo = {‘someUnknownKey‘:{propToCheck:true}, ‘someKnownKey‘:true}; Now, I want to find this document using the selector {someKnownKey:{$exists:true}} but i also want to make sure that none of the other keys have an object with the property propToCheck. So, like the following: {‘*.propToCheck‘:{$exists:false}, {someKnownKey:{$exists:true}}} – doubletapMay 3 ‘12 at 17:57

mongodb的通配符查询的一次失败经验

码农公寓

相关文章