Directory
- Grammar
- Title & Authors & Footnote
- Abstract
- 一、 Introduction
- 二、 System Model
- 三、 Problem Formulation
- 四、 Solvers
- 五、 Simulations And Performance Evaluations
- 六、 Conclusion
Grammar
- 单复数、现在时过去时、主动态被动态、以及动名词过去分词混用
- 是否存在多个动词、从句层次过多、断句混乱、以及单词拼写错误
注意：可以使用Ginger Writer软件检查语法错误。
Title & Authors & Footnote
Title
- The title should be concise, and need to prevent double in Web of Science;
- The title should exist proper nouns, for easily searching.
Authors
Format：Zuo, Feng, Xinyu, Chen, Member, IEEE, and Yu, Chen, Fellow, IEEE
To be noted,
- Put a space between authors’ initials and title;
- people‘s title should be italic.
Footnote
- First paragraph: Date on which you submitted your paper for review + Support information
- Second paragraph: Authors’ current affiliations, including current address and e-mail.
~~~~ Manuscript received month day, year; revised April 14, 2021; accepted April 16, 2021. This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China under Grant xxx. This research was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant xxx, xxx, and xxx. (Corresponding author: Xinyu Chen.)
~~~~ Z. Feng is with the School of Electronic and Information Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China (e-mail: xxx@scut.edu.com).
Abstract
1. Content
- The Importance of the Problem or the Research Field
- Introduce the Problem
- The Shortcomings of Existing works
- Our Works & Contributions & Innovations
- The Conclusions of Simulations
注意：
- The abstract should be corresponding to the title and conclusion, and must be between 150-250 words.
- The title should be without italic fonts, refferences, and equations.
- Abbreviations should give full letters and be capital in the initial.
2. Keywords
- Keyworks should be limited to 3-6 words and can not be abbreviate.
- Keywords can be set to models, algorithms, concept, and professional terms.
一、 Introduction
A. Content
A. The importance and development of the research field;
B. Introduce the Problem & What is the Problem ;
C. The Shortcomings of Existing Related Works;
D. Our Works & Innovations &Contributions ;
E. The Arrangements of this Article.
To be noted,
- The descritpion of our works can not repeat with the sentences in the Abstract and Conclusion;
- The conclusions from references should be orderly, and the sentences froms references can not be double.
B. Abbreviations and Acronyms
- Define abbreviations and acronyms the first time they are used in the text, even after they have already been defined in the abstract;
- Abbreviations (such as IEEE, SI, ac, and dc) do not have to be defined;
- Abbreviations that incorporate periods should not have spaces: write “C.N.R.S.,” not “C. N. R. S.”;
- Do not use abbreviations in the title unless they are unavoidable (for example, “IEEE” in the title of this article);
- Initials of abbreviations should be capital.
二、 System Model
A. Content
- 模型图应一开始给出，并附带解释
- 系统模型的假设应有参考文献支持&解释说明
- 模型是否贴近工程实际、有应用背景
- 公式中变量、矢量、矩阵格式是否规范
- 文中引用的编号是否准确，格式：(\ref{xxx})
- 繁冗的公式推导是否以附录放在结论后并在文中引用
三、 Problem Formulation
四、 Solvers
五、 Simulations And Performance Evaluations
This section is to teach how to write the Section Simulations And Performance Evaluations.
1、 Simulation Environments
A. Introduce the source of dataset
In the experiments, we have three real-world datasets which are the A [1], the B [2], and the C [3], respectively.
B. Introduce strategies compared
We compare the proposed A and B methods with C [53], D [54], and the E method [45] which is called F in this paper.
2、 Simulation Parameters
In the following subsections, if not specifically stated, the experimental settings are as follows/(showed in Table Ⅰ): (1) a a a is ∗ * ∗. (2) b b b is ∗ * ∗.
3、 Simulation Results
F i g . 1 P a r a . y v s . P a r a . x Fig.1 ~Para.y ~vs. ~Para. x Fig.1 Para.y vs. Para.x
A. Illustration on trends
1) gap
The gap of P a r a . y Para. y Para.y between the A A A and B B B narrows/broadens as P a r a . x Para. x Para.x increases.
B. Illustration on trends
1) Description on data
When the P a r a . x Para. x Para.x is ∗ * ∗, the P a r a . y Para. y Para.y of C C C, the proposed A A A method and the proposed B B B method are ∗ * ∗, ∗ * ∗, ∗ * ∗, and ∗ * ∗, respectively.
The performance of all the schemes under different p a r a . x para.x para.x is displayed in Fig. ∗ * ∗.
2) All proposed schemes better
We can see that the performance of the proposed methods is better than the comparison methods.
3) Comparison schemes better than proposed one
One can read from the results that the performance of the proposed A A A is better than all the comparison methods, and the performance of the proposed B B B is slightly worse than the C C C.
The P a r a Para Para of the proposed method has better performance than that of A A A method.