ThreadGroup其实比ExecutorService更好

用java做抓取的时候免不了要用到多线程的了,因为要同时抓取多个网站或一条线程抓取一个网站的话实在太慢,而且有时一条线程抓取同一个网站的话也比较浪费CPU资源。要用到多线程的等方面,也就免不了对线程的控制或用到线程池。   我在做我们现在的那一个抓取框架的时候,就曾经用过java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService作为线程池,关于ExecutorService的使用代码大概如下:
java.util.concurrent.Executors类的API提供大量创建连接池的静态方法:1.固定大小的线程池:

ThreadGroup其实比ExecutorService更好
package BackStage;

 import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
 import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;

 public class JavaThreadPool {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        // 创建一个可重用固定线程数的线程池
         ExecutorService pool = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(2);
        // 创建实现了Runnable接口对象,Thread对象当然也实现了Runnable接口
        Thread t1 = new MyThread();
        Thread t2 = new MyThread();
        Thread t3 = new MyThread();
        Thread t4 = new MyThread();
        Thread t5 = new MyThread();
        // 将线程放入池中进行执行
        pool.execute(t1);
        pool.execute(t2);
        pool.execute(t3);
        pool.execute(t4);
        pool.execute(t5);
        // 关闭线程池
        pool.shutdown();
    }
}

class MyThread extends Thread {
    @Override
    public void run() {
        System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + "正在执行。。。");
    }
}
ThreadGroup其实比ExecutorService更好

后来发现ExecutorService的功能没有想像中的那么好,而且最多只是提供一个线程的容器而然,所以后来我用改用了java.lang.ThreadGroup,ThreadGroup有很多优势,最重要的一点就是它可以对线程进行遍历,知道那些线程已经运行完毕,还有那些线程在运行。关于ThreadGroup的使用代码如下:

ThreadGroup其实比ExecutorService更好
class MyThread extends Thread {
  boolean stopped;

  MyThread(ThreadGroup tg, String name) {
    super(tg, name);
    stopped = false;
  }

  public void run() {
    System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + " starting.");
    try {
      for (int i = 1; i < 1000; i++) {
        System.out.print(".");
        Thread.sleep(250);
        synchronized (this) {
          if (stopped)
            break;
        }
      }
    } catch (Exception exc) {
      System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + " interrupted.");
    }
    System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + " exiting.");
  }

  synchronized void myStop() {
    stopped = true;
  }
}

public class Main {
  public static void main(String args[]) throws Exception {
    ThreadGroup tg = new ThreadGroup("My Group");

    MyThread thrd = new MyThread(tg, "MyThread #1");
    MyThread thrd2 = new MyThread(tg, "MyThread #2");
    MyThread thrd3 = new MyThread(tg, "MyThread #3");

    thrd.start();
    thrd2.start();
    thrd3.start();

    Thread.sleep(1000);

    System.out.println(tg.activeCount() + " threads in thread group.");

    Thread thrds[] = new Thread[tg.activeCount()];
    tg.enumerate(thrds);
    for (Thread t : thrds)
      System.out.println(t.getName());

    thrd.myStop();

    Thread.sleep(1000);
    
    System.out.println(tg.activeCount() + " threads in tg.");
    tg.interrupt();
  }
}
ThreadGroup其实比ExecutorService更好

由以上的代码可以看出:ThreadGroup比ExecutorService多以下几个优势  

1.ThreadGroup可以遍历线程,知道那些线程已经运行完毕,那些还在运行  

2.可以通过ThreadGroup.activeCount知道有多少线程从而可以控制插入的线程数

ThreadGroup其实比ExecutorService更好

上一篇:软件体系结构经典问题——KWIC的分析和解决


下一篇:浙江卫视(高清)在线直播-PPS直播