单例模式的七种实现-Singleton(Java实现)

1. 饿汉式

实现代码:

public class Singleton {
private Singleton() {
} private static Singleton singleton = new Singleton(); public static Singleton getInstance() {
return singleton;
}
}

验证一下:

    public static void main(String[] args) {
Singleton s1 = Singleton.getInstance();
Singleton s2 = Singleton.getInstance(); System.out.println(s1 == s2);
// true
}

如果用反射, 是否仍然是单例:

结果是反射破坏了单例

    public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
// 自定义单例方法获取
Singleton s1 = Singleton.getInstance(); // 反射获取
Constructor constructor = Singleton.class.getDeclaredConstructor();
constructor.setAccessible(true);
Singleton s2 = (Singleton) constructor.newInstance(); System.out.println(s1 == s2);
//false
}

2. 懒汉式

将上面的饿汉式改为懒汉式:

public class Singleton {
private Singleton() {
} private static Singleton singleton; public static Singleton getInstance() {
if (singleton == null) {
singleton = new Singleton();
}
return singleton;
}

验证一下:

    public static void main(String[] args) {
Singleton s1 = Singleton.getInstance();
Singleton s2 = Singleton.getInstance(); System.out.println(s1 == s2);
// true
}

不过这是一种线程不安全的单例实现.

我们在Singleton中加上sleep来模拟一下线程切换:

public class Singleton {
private Singleton() {
} private static Singleton singleton; public static Singleton getInstance() {
if (singleton == null) {
try {
Thread.sleep(0);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
singleton = new Singleton();
}
return singleton;
}
}

验证一下线程不安全:

public class Main3 {
private static LinkedBlockingQueue<Singleton> singletons = new LinkedBlockingQueue<>();
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception{
ExecutorService threadPool = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(10);
for(int i= 0;i<100;i++){
threadPool.execute(()->{
singletons.offer(Singleton.getInstance());
});
} Singleton basic = singletons.take();
while(basic==singletons.take()){
System.out.println("continue");
continue;
} System.out.println("走到这里说明单例失败");
}
}

单例模式的七种实现-Singleton(Java实现)

3. 懒汉式+同步方法

public class Singleton {
private Singleton() {
} private static Singleton singleton; public synchronized static Singleton getInstance() {
if (singleton == null) {
singleton = new Singleton();
}
return singleton;
}
}

验证一下:

    public static void main(String[] args) {
Singleton s1 = Singleton.getInstance();
Singleton s2 = Singleton.getInstance(); System.out.println(s1 == s2);
// true
}

由于是同步, 所以同步方法内不会出现多线程执行的情况.

4. 懒汉式+双重校验锁

因为上面那种会每次进时都会进行同步锁, 很浪费性能, 所以在加锁之间先进行校验

public class Singleton{
private Singleton() {
} private static Singleton singleton; public static Singleton getInstance() {
if (singleton==null) {
synchronized (Singleton.class) {
if (singleton == null) {
singleton = new Singleton();
}
}
}
return singleton;
}
}

验证一下性能:

能明显看出来性能差距...5千倍...

同步方法, 即直接在方法声明处加了Synchronize的情况:

    public static void main(String[] args){
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
for(int i= 0;i<999999999;i++){
Singleton s = Singleton.getInstance();
}
System.out.println(System.currentTimeMillis()-start);
}

单例模式的七种实现-Singleton(Java实现)

双重校验锁:

    public static void main(String[] args){
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
for(int i= 0;i<999999999;i++){
Singleton s = Singleton.getInstance();
}
System.out.println(System.currentTimeMillis()-start);
}

单例模式的七种实现-Singleton(Java实现)

5. 懒汉式+双重校验锁+防止指令重拍

看似简单的一段赋值语句:instance = new Singleton(); 其实JVM内部已经转换为多条指令:

memory = allocate(); //1:分配对象的内存空间

ctorInstance(memory); //2:初始化对象

instance = memory; //3:设置instance指向刚分配的内存地址

但是经过重排序后如下:

memory = allocate(); //1:分配对象的内存空间

instance = memory; //3:设置instance指向刚分配的内存地址,此时对象还没被初始化

ctorInstance(memory); //2:初始化对象

可以看到指令重排之后,instance指向分配好的内存放在了前面,而这段内存的初始化被排在了后面,在线程A初始化完成这段内存之前,线程B虽然进不去同步代码块,但是在同步代码块之前的判断就会发现instance不为空,此时线程B获得instance对象进行使用就可能发生错误。

加上volatile关键字:

public class Singleton {
private Singleton() {
} private volatile static Singleton singleton; public static Singleton getInstance() {
if (singleton == null) {
synchronized (Singleton.class) {
if (singleton == null) {
singleton = new Singleton();
}
}
}
return singleton;
}
}

验证一下性能:

能明显看出来加了volatile后对性能的影响, 由之前的5, 变为了302...

性能下降了, 但是相比于上面的双重校验锁, 更保证了线程安全.

    public static void main(String[] args){
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
for(int i= 0;i<999999999;i++){
Singleton s = Singleton.getInstance();
}
System.out.println(System.currentTimeMillis()-start);
}

单例模式的七种实现-Singleton(Java实现)

6. 静态内部类

这也是一种很好的实现方式, 不仅懒加载, 还保证了线程安全, 性能也很好, 实现起来也很简单

public class Singleton {
private static class LazyHolder {
private static final Singleton instance = new Singleton();
} private Singleton() {
} public static Singleton getInstance() {
return LazyHolder.instance;
}
}

验证一下性能:

public static void main(String[] args){
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
for(int i= 0;i<999999999;i++){
Singleton s = Singleton.getInstance();
}
System.out.println(System.currentTimeMillis()-start);
}

单例模式的七种实现-Singleton(Java实现)

7. 枚举

个人对枚举类型的理解还有限, 有待学习....

public enum Singleton {
INSTANCE; private String name; Singleton() {
this.name = "king";
}
public static Singleton getInstance() {
return INSTANCE;
} public String getName() {
return this.name;
}
}

验证一下性能:

    public static void main(String[] args){
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
for(int i= 0;i<999999999;i++){
Singleton s = Singleton.getInstance();
}
System.out.println(System.currentTimeMillis()-start);
}

单例模式的七种实现-Singleton(Java实现)

上一篇:day 23-1 类的命名空间、组合


下一篇:【收集资料】OpenGL学习