JDK作泛型比较时为什么把逻辑代码写两遍

疑惑:JDK作泛型比较时为什么不用一个compare函数把比较封装起来,而是把逻辑代码写两遍(Comparable 和 Comparator)?

在 PriorityQueue 和 TreeMap 中都如此

TreeMap put源码

    /**
     * Associates the specified value with the specified key in this map.
     * If the map previously contained a mapping for the key, the old
     * value is replaced.
     *
     * @param key key with which the specified value is to be associated
     * @param value value to be associated with the specified key
     *
     * @return the previous value associated with {@code key}, or
     *         {@code null} if there was no mapping for {@code key}.
     *         (A {@code null} return can also indicate that the map
     *         previously associated {@code null} with {@code key}.)
     * @throws ClassCastException if the specified key cannot be compared
     *         with the keys currently in the map
     * @throws NullPointerException if the specified key is null
     *         and this map uses natural ordering, or its comparator
     *         does not permit null keys
     */
    public V put(K key, V value) {
        Entry<K,V> t = root;
        if (t == null) {
            compare(key, key); // type (and possibly null) check

            root = new Entry<>(key, value, null);
            size = 1;
            modCount++;
            return null;
        }
        int cmp;
        Entry<K,V> parent;
     // 从这里开始 // split comparator and comparable paths Comparator<? super K> cpr = comparator; if (cpr != null) { do { parent = t; cmp = cpr.compare(key, t.key); if (cmp < 0) t = t.left; else if (cmp > 0) t = t.right; else return t.setValue(value); } while (t != null); } else { if (key == null) throw new NullPointerException(); @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") Comparable<? super K> k = (Comparable<? super K>) key; do { parent = t; cmp = k.compareTo(t.key); if (cmp < 0) t = t.left; else if (cmp > 0) t = t.right; else return t.setValue(value); } while (t != null); }
     // 到这里 Entry<K,V> e = new Entry<>(key, value, parent); if (cmp < 0) parent.left = e; else parent.right = e; fixAfterInsertion(e); size++; modCount++; return null; }

 

    // Little utilities

    /**
     * Compares two keys using the correct comparison method for this TreeMap.
     */
    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
    final int compare(Object k1, Object k2) {
        return comparator==null ? ((Comparable<? super K>)k1).compareTo((K)k2)
            : comparator.compare((K)k1, (K)k2);
    }

 

红色段落将有无comparator的情况分开,写了两遍逻辑代码。

就算已经写好了compare函数封装了比较,也不用,甚至只是用它去类型检查。

我的理解是减少判空次数,提升效率。

若有知情人士,请在评论区留言告诉我,不胜感激。

上一篇:DataGridView获取或者设置当前单元格的内容


下一篇:「一本通 1.1 练习 3」线段