我的类层次结构设置为每个子的__init __()必须将self._init_has_run()设置为False,调用父的__init __(),然后执行自己的__init __(),最后将self._init_has_run()设置为True.我有以下代码:
class Parent:
def __init__(self, arg1, arg2):
pass # do stuff
def init(cls, fun):
def decorated_init(self, *args, **kwargs):
self._init_has_run = False
x = super()
super().__init__(*args, **kwargs)
fun(self, *args, **kwargs)
self._init_has_run = True
return decorated_init
class Child(Parent):
@Parent.init
def __init__(self, arg1, arg2):
pass # do stuff
由于有许多子类遵循__init __()的相同通用模式,并且我无法弄清楚如何使用元类,我使用装饰器来合并重复逻辑,然后将该装饰器应用于所有后代__init__ () 方法.
Python正在抛出以下内容:
File "filename.py", line 82, in decorated_init
super().__init__(*args, **kwargs)
TypeError: object.__init__() takes no parameters
我通过调试器确认self._init_has_run的切换工作正常,而super()正在解析为Parent类,但是当装饰器试图调用super().__ init __(* args,** kwargs)时,为什么Python会尝试调用object .__ init __()代替?
解决方法:
您可以轻松地使用元类来执行一些pre / post-init之类的东西.考虑这个例子:
class Meta(type):
def __new__(meta, *args):
# This is something like 'class constructor'.
# It is called once for every new class definition.
# It sets default value of '_init_has_run' for all new objects.
# This is analog to `class Foo: _init_has_run = False`:
# new objects will all have _init_has_run set to False by default.
cls = super(Parent, meta).__new__(meta, *args)
cls._init_has_run = False
return cls
def __call__(cls, *args, **kwargs):
# This is called each time you create new object.
# It will run new object's constructor
# and change _init_has_run to False.
obj = type.__call__(cls, *args, **kwargs)
obj._init_has_run = True
return obj
class Child:
__metaclass__ = Meta
def __init__(self):
print 'init:', self._init_has_run
def foo(self):
print 'foo:', self._init_has_run
a = Child()
a.foo()
a = Child()
a.foo()
输出:
init: False
foo: True
init: False
foo: True
希望这可以帮助!