我正在阅读文章Tips for Evading Anti-Virus During Pen Testing,并对给定的Python程序感到惊讶:
from ctypes import *
shellcode = '\xfc\xe8\x89\x00\x00....'
memorywithshell = create_string_buffer(shellcode, len(shellcode))
shell = cast(memorywithshell, CFUNCTYPE(c_void_p))
shell()
shellcode缩短了.有人可以解释发生了什么吗?我熟悉Python和C,我已经尝试过读取ctypes
模块,但还有两个主要问题:
>什么存储在shellcode中?
我知道这与C有关(在文章中它是来自Metasploit的shellcode,并且选择了不同的ASCII符号),但是我无法确定它是否是C源(可能不是)或源于某种编译(哪一个?).
>根据第一个问题,演员阵容中发生了什么?
解决方法:
看看这个shellcode,我从here开始它(它弹出一个MessageBoxA):
#include <stdio.h>
typedef void (* function_t)(void);
unsigned char shellcode[] =
"\xFC\x33\xD2\xB2\x30\x64\xFF\x32\x5A\x8B"
"\x52\x0C\x8B\x52\x14\x8B\x72\x28\x33\xC9"
"\xB1\x18\x33\xFF\x33\xC0\xAC\x3C\x61\x7C"
"\x02\x2C\x20\xC1\xCF\x0D\x03\xF8\xE2\xF0"
"\x81\xFF\x5B\xBC\x4A\x6A\x8B\x5A\x10\x8B"
"\x12\x75\xDA\x8B\x53\x3C\x03\xD3\xFF\x72"
"\x34\x8B\x52\x78\x03\xD3\x8B\x72\x20\x03"
"\xF3\x33\xC9\x41\xAD\x03\xC3\x81\x38\x47"
"\x65\x74\x50\x75\xF4\x81\x78\x04\x72\x6F"
"\x63\x41\x75\xEB\x81\x78\x08\x64\x64\x72"
"\x65\x75\xE2\x49\x8B\x72\x24\x03\xF3\x66"
"\x8B\x0C\x4E\x8B\x72\x1C\x03\xF3\x8B\x14"
"\x8E\x03\xD3\x52\x33\xFF\x57\x68\x61\x72"
"\x79\x41\x68\x4C\x69\x62\x72\x68\x4C\x6F"
"\x61\x64\x54\x53\xFF\xD2\x68\x33\x32\x01"
"\x01\x66\x89\x7C\x24\x02\x68\x75\x73\x65"
"\x72\x54\xFF\xD0\x68\x6F\x78\x41\x01\x8B"
"\xDF\x88\x5C\x24\x03\x68\x61\x67\x65\x42"
"\x68\x4D\x65\x73\x73\x54\x50\xFF\x54\x24"
"\x2C\x57\x68\x4F\x5F\x6F\x21\x8B\xDC\x57"
"\x53\x53\x57\xFF\xD0\x68\x65\x73\x73\x01"
"\x8B\xDF\x88\x5C\x24\x03\x68\x50\x72\x6F"
"\x63\x68\x45\x78\x69\x74\x54\xFF\x74\x24"
"\x40\xFF\x54\x24\x40\x57\xFF\xD0";
void real_function(void) {
puts("I'm here");
}
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
function_t function = (function_t) &shellcode[0];
real_function();
function();
return 0;
}
在任何调试器下编译它是一个钩子,我将使用gdb:
> gcc shellcode.c -o shellcode
> gdb -q shellcode.exe
Reading symbols from shellcode.exe...done.
(gdb)
>
反汇编主函数,看看调用real_function和function之间有什么不同:
(gdb) disassemble main
Dump of assembler code for function main:
0x004013a0 <+0>: push %ebp
0x004013a1 <+1>: mov %esp,%ebp
0x004013a3 <+3>: and $0xfffffff0,%esp
0x004013a6 <+6>: sub $0x10,%esp
0x004013a9 <+9>: call 0x4018e4 <__main>
0x004013ae <+14>: movl $0x402000,0xc(%esp)
0x004013b6 <+22>: call 0x40138c <real_function> ; <- here we call our `real_function`
0x004013bb <+27>: mov 0xc(%esp),%eax
0x004013bf <+31>: call *%eax ; <- here we call the address that is loaded in eax (the address of the beginning of our shellcode)
0x004013c1 <+33>: mov $0x0,%eax
0x004013c6 <+38>: leave
0x004013c7 <+39>: ret
End of assembler dump.
(gdb)
有两个电话,让我们在< main 31>处设一个断点.看看eax中加载了什么:
(gdb) break *(main+31)
Breakpoint 1 at 0x4013bf
(gdb) run
Starting program: shellcode.exe
[New Thread 2856.0xb24]
I'm here
Breakpoint 1, 0x004013bf in main ()
(gdb) disassemble
Dump of assembler code for function main:
0x004013a0 <+0>: push %ebp
0x004013a1 <+1>: mov %esp,%ebp
0x004013a3 <+3>: and $0xfffffff0,%esp
0x004013a6 <+6>: sub $0x10,%esp
0x004013a9 <+9>: call 0x4018e4 <__main>
0x004013ae <+14>: movl $0x402000,0xc(%esp)
0x004013b6 <+22>: call 0x40138c <real_function>
0x004013bb <+27>: mov 0xc(%esp),%eax
=> 0x004013bf <+31>: call *%eax ; now we are here
0x004013c1 <+33>: mov $0x0,%eax
0x004013c6 <+38>: leave
0x004013c7 <+39>: ret
End of assembler dump.
(gdb)
查看eax中地址继续的数据的前3个字节:
(gdb) x/3x $eax
0x402000 <shellcode>: 0xfc 0x33 0xd2
(gdb) ^-------^--------^---- the first 3 bytes of the shellcode
所以CPU会调用0x402000,我们的shell代码的开头是0x402000,让我们在0x402000处反汇编:
(gdb) disassemble 0x402000
Dump of assembler code for function shellcode:
0x00402000 <+0>: cld
0x00402001 <+1>: xor %edx,%edx
0x00402003 <+3>: mov $0x30,%dl
0x00402005 <+5>: pushl %fs:(%edx)
0x00402008 <+8>: pop %edx
0x00402009 <+9>: mov 0xc(%edx),%edx
0x0040200c <+12>: mov 0x14(%edx),%edx
0x0040200f <+15>: mov 0x28(%edx),%esi
0x00402012 <+18>: xor %ecx,%ecx
0x00402014 <+20>: mov $0x18,%cl
0x00402016 <+22>: xor %edi,%edi
0x00402018 <+24>: xor %eax,%eax
0x0040201a <+26>: lods %ds:(%esi),%al
0x0040201b <+27>: cmp $0x61,%al
0x0040201d <+29>: jl 0x402021 <shellcode+33>
....
如您所见,shellcode只不过是汇编指令,唯一不同的是您编写这些指令的方式,它使用特殊技术使其更具可移植性,例如从不使用固定地址.
python等同于上面的程序:
#!python
from ctypes import *
shellcode_data = "\
\xFC\x33\xD2\xB2\x30\x64\xFF\x32\x5A\x8B\
\x52\x0C\x8B\x52\x14\x8B\x72\x28\x33\xC9\
\xB1\x18\x33\xFF\x33\xC0\xAC\x3C\x61\x7C\
\x02\x2C\x20\xC1\xCF\x0D\x03\xF8\xE2\xF0\
\x81\xFF\x5B\xBC\x4A\x6A\x8B\x5A\x10\x8B\
\x12\x75\xDA\x8B\x53\x3C\x03\xD3\xFF\x72\
\x34\x8B\x52\x78\x03\xD3\x8B\x72\x20\x03\
\xF3\x33\xC9\x41\xAD\x03\xC3\x81\x38\x47\
\x65\x74\x50\x75\xF4\x81\x78\x04\x72\x6F\
\x63\x41\x75\xEB\x81\x78\x08\x64\x64\x72\
\x65\x75\xE2\x49\x8B\x72\x24\x03\xF3\x66\
\x8B\x0C\x4E\x8B\x72\x1C\x03\xF3\x8B\x14\
\x8E\x03\xD3\x52\x33\xFF\x57\x68\x61\x72\
\x79\x41\x68\x4C\x69\x62\x72\x68\x4C\x6F\
\x61\x64\x54\x53\xFF\xD2\x68\x33\x32\x01\
\x01\x66\x89\x7C\x24\x02\x68\x75\x73\x65\
\x72\x54\xFF\xD0\x68\x6F\x78\x41\x01\x8B\
\xDF\x88\x5C\x24\x03\x68\x61\x67\x65\x42\
\x68\x4D\x65\x73\x73\x54\x50\xFF\x54\x24\
\x2C\x57\x68\x4F\x5F\x6F\x21\x8B\xDC\x57\
\x53\x53\x57\xFF\xD0\x68\x65\x73\x73\x01\
\x8B\xDF\x88\x5C\x24\x03\x68\x50\x72\x6F\
\x63\x68\x45\x78\x69\x74\x54\xFF\x74\x24\
\x40\xFF\x54\x24\x40\x57\xFF\xD0"
shellcode = c_char_p(shellcode_data)
function = cast(shellcode, CFUNCTYPE(None))
function()